Limited Irrigation

Pairing crop water needs for corn with limited irrigation

Limited irrigation may be a fact that many producers are facing. It should be noted that most irrigation systems in Kansas are generally not designed to meet peak crop ET (evapotranspiration), but at a level that maximizes water resource usage (Dr. Dan Rogers, K-State Irrigation Engineer). One item that is always discussed is minimizing stress on corn plants at critical times. Here is a discussion of those critical times and the effects they have on corn yield.

Making decisions based on crops water usage

Limited water in our environment is a given, whether in a dryland or irrigated system. However, we can manage the soil and water content to our benefit. Limited water is at the forefront of many producers' minds. Many cases of limited water spur from physical limitations, where the irrigation system can't keep up with the crop needs. In other cases, it is an institutional limitation, such as the LEMA enacted in Sheridan 6, where producers can pump 55 inches of irrigation water over a 5 year period.

We are lucky to have silty loam soils throughout much of the K-State Sunflower District. This means we can store up to 2 inches of water per foot of soil. This means we have a full profile, plants can extract roughly 8 inches of water in the top 4 feet of soil.

Now why is that important? Let's compare wheat and corn. For wheat, it takes 10 inches of water to grow a vegetative plant and move a plant into the seed producing portion of the life cycle. For corn, this value is 10.9 inches. If we have a full profile (8 in of water in 4 feet), it is close, but not quite enough to help grow both a corn and wheat. The good news is that most of the time we are getting moisture to help grow this plant.

The next stage of the plant's life cycle is important and how it utilizes the water available. For wheat, we get 6 bushels per acre of wheat for 1 inch of soil moisture. For corn, 16.9 bu/ac for each inch of water. Therefore, we get more yield per inch of water from corn. However, under dry conditions, the wheat plant will enter it's reproductive stages with less water than corn. Hence, why wheat is considered more drought tolerant than corn.

For other drought tolerant crops, the values to grow a plant are even lower. To grow a plant to the reproductive stages, it takes 5.4 and 6.9 inches with sunflower and grain sorghum, respectively. Then for each additional inch of water, sunflowers produce 218 lb/ac and grain sorghum produces 12.2 bu/ac. It should be noted, that several yield components are being set during the time that most people would call 'vegetative'. For example, head size is being determined at jointing at wheat.

Thankfully, we do not just rely on stored soil moisture to feed crops throughout the growing season. The wettest months are May, June, July and August. The moisture received during this time coincides with the times of peak water useage of crops.

Looking over the weather data for the past couple of years, we are quite a ways behind normal. For 2013, the precipitation is 4.17, 3.08, and 5.70 below normal for Cheyenne, Sherman, and Wallace counties, respectively. If you look even further back, we are behind 6.02, 11.0, and 12.15 inches in Cheyenne, Sherman, and Wallace counties in 2012.

When you are finishing your cropping plans, keep in mind how much water it takes to grow a plant and where your farm is for stored soil moisture. Charts with these values are available on our website at www.sunflower.ksu.edu and click on the Agronomy tab.

Pre-season irrigation with low well capacities

As you drive around the countryside, you will see many irrigation pivots running. They are not watering wheat, but rather ground that is going to corn this spring. There are differing opinions on the use of preseason irrigation.

Many of the irrigation systems today in the Central Great Plains no longer have the capacity to apply peak irrigation needs during the summer and must rely on soil water reserves to buffer the crop from water stress. Considerable research was conducted on preseason irrigation in the US Great Plains region during the 1980s and 1990s. In general, the conclusions were that in-season irrigation was more beneficial than preseason irrigation and that often preseason irrigation was not warranted.

Because the well capacities have dropped and the market place has changed, the K-State Research and Extension Center in Tribune conducted research on preseason irrigation, from 2006 to 2009. The objective of this study was to determine whether preseason irrigation would be profitable with today's lower capacity wells.

The study layout consisted of preplant irrigation (0 to 3 inches), 3 well capacities (0.1, 0.15, 0.20 in/day capacity), and three seeding rates (22,500, 27,500, and 32,500 seeds/a). The preseason irrigation was applied in early April because earlier studies showed that spring irrigation is more efficient than fall applied irrigation (70% for spring vs 33% for fall). In season irrigation was applied weekly to meet crop needs, except when precipitation was sufficient.

Here are the results of the study. Corn yields responded positively to preseason irrigation and increases in well capacity. This was generally from increases in kernels per ear. Preseason irrigation increased grain yields an average of 16 bu/a with a well capacity of 0.10 in/day while only 7 bu/a with a well capacity of 0.20 in/day. As expected, grain yields increased with the increased well capacity.

Grain yields were 29% greater when well capapcity was increased from 0.10 to 0.20 in/day. Crop water productivity (CWP, grain yield divided by crop water use) was not significantly affected by well capacity or preseason irrigation. Preseason irrigation was profitable at all well capacities. At well capacities of 0.10 and 0.15 in/day, a seeding rate of 27,500 seeds/a was generally more profitable than lower or higher seeding rates. A higher seeding rate (32,500 seeds/a) increased profitability when well capacity was increased to 0.20 in/day.